Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Smoke black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is a lot better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 score. IPhone 12 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Moto G Power works with Android 11 OS. IPhone 12 Pro's body is a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Moto G Power, although both were released with only a couple of months difference.
IPhone 12 Pro has a better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits CPU. Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px and a quite better display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro and Motorola Moto G Power feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a lot worse resolution camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos.
Moto G Power has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2815mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 12 Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Power, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.