Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Smoke black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's score of 76.1. Despite of the fact that Apple iPhone XS is older than Motorola Moto G Power, it's construction is much thinner and somewhat lighter. Apple iPhone XS counts with a better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS features a brighter display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better display density and a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution. IPhone XS shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Moto G Power counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power features a much better battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2659mAh.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.