Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone has a general score of 77.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. The Asus ROG Phone is an older and a bit heavier phone than Motorola Moto G Power, but Asus managed to make it thinner anyway. The Asus ROG Phone features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little better screen pixels density.
The Asus ROG Phone features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Asus ROG Phone counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM memory.
The Moto G Power features a way better camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images.
Moto G Power features greater battery performance than Asus ROG Phone, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Although Asus ROG Phone is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Asus ROG Phone, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.