Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a score of 76.2 against 76.1. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, but Asus was able to make it thinner and somewhat lighter. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's CPU is just as good as the Moto G Power one, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a battery duration that is very similar to Moto G Power's battery duration. Moto G Power shoots a bit better photos and videos than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G Power also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.