Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Google Pixel is an extremely older phone than Motorola Moto G Power, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The Google Pixel counts with a little bit better display than Moto G Power, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto G Power features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a higher number of cores. Motorola Moto G Power has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a larger aperture and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Moto G Power features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Google Pixel, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.