Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 82.5 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G Power, although it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a greater pixel density.
The Moto G Power features more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Moto G Power counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh. The Motorola Moto G Power features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
Google Pixel 2 XL costs a little more than Moto G Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.