Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Moto G Power, with a overall score of 80 against 76.1. Google Pixel 3 is an older cellphone than Moto G Power, but Google was able to build it noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G Power. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a slightly better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The Motorola Moto G Power has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back and a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments.
Moto G Power features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3 is a little more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.