Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with a global score of 80.7 against 76.1. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, but Google made it a little lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G Power. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3430mAh.
Google Pixel 3 XL costs more money than Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.