Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Google Pixel 3a's body is thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released only 12 months before.
Google Pixel 3a's processing unit is just as good as the processing unit in Moto G Power, both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cores. The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
Moto G Power has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Power also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G Power has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 3a is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.