Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with a 78.9 score against 76.1. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released around a year before. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a screen that's just as good as the Moto G Power one, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount in each inch of screen. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL's CPU is just as good as the Motorola Moto G Power one, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. The Moto G Power features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G Power also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Motorola Moto G Power features longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs a little more money than the Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.