Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Smoke black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Moto G Power, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 76.1. Google Pixel 4's design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto G Power, although they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4 features just a bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Motorola Moto G Power features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.