Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Smoke black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is thinner and just a little lighter than Moto G Power, even when they were released only 6 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a greater display density. Moto G Power features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power has longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% greater battery capacity. The Moto G Power captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Power also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, else you can save some dollars and get the Moto G Power, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.