Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Smoke black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than the Moto G Power, with a general score of 82.9 against 76.1. Even when the Google Pixel 4a and the Moto G Power were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4a is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Google Pixel 4a features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a features just a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch.
Moto G Power shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Moto G Power also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G Power has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4a is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.