Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Smoke black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto G Power, with a general score of 87.5 against 76.1. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system, so both should provide the same OS features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than the Moto G Power, although both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a much less MP resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality.
Motorola Moto G Power has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power features superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4a 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.