Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Smoke black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, getting a general score of 89 against 76.1. Google Pixel 5 is a lighter and thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, although both of them were released with only a few months difference. The Google Pixel 5 has just a little better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit better pixels density. Moto G Power counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Moto G Power features superior battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 5 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 5, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Power, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.