Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a general score of 77 against 76.1. HTC U Ultra is an much older phone than Motorola Moto G Power, but it is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The HTC U Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Moto G Power has a little bit better processing power than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Power also has a larger number of cores.
Motorola Moto G Power has a really longer battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G Power takes clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger aperture and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Although HTC U Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Moto G Power, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.