Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 397 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC U11 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a global score of 77.6 against 76.1. Despite of the fact that HTC U11 is extremely older than the Motorola Moto G Power, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. HTC U11 has a little faster CPU than Moto G Power. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The HTC U11 features a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto G Power counts with a greater memory for games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G Power also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G Power features a slightly better camera than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 16 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power has a superior battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although HTC U11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto G Power, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.