Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a global score of 81 against 76.1. LG G7 ThinQ's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features.
LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Moto G Power. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ features a way better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Moto G Power, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have a same resolution camera and the same (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments.
Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG G7 ThinQ costs a little more money than Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.