Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is better than Moto G Power, having a general score of 84.3 against 76.1. Even though the LG G8 ThinQ is older than the Moto G Power, it's body is somewhat lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto G Power has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG G8 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G Power has a way better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. LG G8 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a much less megapixels camera and a lower video quality, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography.
LG G8 ThinQ is way more expensive than Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.