Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a global score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has the older 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version. The LG G8X ThinQ is a a bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Moto G Power, although both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The LG G8X ThinQ has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG G8X ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and a camera in the back with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Moto G Power counts with superior battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.