Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Smoke black | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11. Even though the LG K92 and Motorola Moto G Power were released with only a couple of months difference, LG K92's design is thinner but also a little heavier than Motorola Moto G Power.
LG K92 features a screen that is just as good as Moto G Power's display, because although the LG K92 has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The LG K92 counts with a superior storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG K92 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG K92 also has more RAM. Moto G Power counts with improved battery performance than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. LG K92 captures better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG K92, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G Power, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.