Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 397 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is a little bit better than Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. The LG V10 construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Moto G Power, even though it was released many years before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V10 has 5.1 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The LG V10 counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per display inch. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little faster processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a larger number of cores.
LG V10 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 16 mega pixels and the same video definition, the LG V10 also counts with faster 120 frames per second video frame rate and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs.
The LG V10 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto G Power counts with a much better battery life than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.