Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Smoke black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Moto G Power, having an 82.5 score against 76.1. The LG V30S ThinQ is an noticeably older device than the Moto G Power, but LG managed to make it notably thinner and way lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version and Moto G Power has Android 11, so it offers some extra features.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G Power takes clearer photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 16 MP, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Power also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.