Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. The LG V35 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, but it is notably lighter and much thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a camera that is just as good as Motorola Moto G Power's camera, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back camera with a 16 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Power, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.