Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version. LG V40 ThinQ is an older phone than Motorola Moto G Power, but LG could make it somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner anyway.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V40 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ shoots a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower video definition and a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs more than Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.