Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Smoke black | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, with an 87.1 score against 76.1. LG Velvet's design is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even though both were released only a couple months apart. LG Velvet features a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
The LG Velvet has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG Velvet features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet has a better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with improved battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
The LG Velvet costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.