Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Smoke black | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than Motorola Moto G Power, with an 85.3 score against 76.1. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's construction is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Moto G Power's, but it is heavier. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1892 x 2688px and a bigger screen.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G Power and Microsoft Surface Duo 2 feature really similar cameras, and although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a lower video definition and a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, they both have a F1.7 aperture.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4449mAh.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Power, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.