Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Smoke black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G Power. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11, so it gives you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
Motorola Moto G Power has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture, better video frame rates and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.