Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Smoke black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 150.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting a global score of 87 against 76.1. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even when they were released with only 6 months difference. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 operating system.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a just a bit greater pixels quantity per screen inch, a bit larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2300 resolution.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much more MP back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs.
Motorola Moto G Power counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.