Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Smoke black | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, getting a 76.4 score against 76.1. Nokia 9 PureView's body is lighter and thinner than Moto G Power, even though it was released only 14 months before. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit better processing power than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a 0.36 inches back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G Power also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a way more MP back facing camera.
The Moto G Power features a better storage to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power has a really longer battery performance than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3320mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G Power. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.