Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Smoke black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a bit better than Moto G Power, with a score of 80.8 against 76.1. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Nokia XR20's body is newer than the Moto G Power's, although it's way heavier and just a little thicker. Nokia XR20 has a little bit better display than Moto G Power, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Nokia XR20 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Nokia XR20 features a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a bit longer battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8% greater battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Power, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.