Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Smoke black | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power has an overall score of 76.1, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Motorola Moto G Power is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but both of them are 0.38inches thick. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G Power has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better looking display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's battery duration is just as good as Motorola Moto G Power's battery performance.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola Moto G Power is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.