Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Smoke black | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a general score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. These phones include Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro and Moto G Power were released with only 1 months difference, the OPPO Find X2 Pro design is just a little heavier but just a bit thinner.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better CPU than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera with lot more mega pixels, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better storage for games and applications than Moto G Power, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Moto G Power counts with superior battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.