Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Smoke black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a score of 76.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G's body is just a bit heavier but thinner than the Motorola Moto G Power. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has newer 14 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version, giving you some nice extra features.
The Moto G Power features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite larger screen.
The Motorola Moto G Power takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments. The Galaxy A16 5G features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A16 5G features a battery performance that's just as good as the battery performance in Moto G Power.
Although Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto G Power, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.