Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 397 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A20s has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Even though the Galaxy A20s and Moto G Power were released with only 6 months difference, the Galaxy A20s is just a bit lighter and thinner. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Moto G Power counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A20s. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2300px and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Power shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A20s, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations, a back camera with a better 16 mega pixels resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
The Moto G Power and the Samsung Galaxy A20s have quite similar memory capacity for applications and games, both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. The Moto G Power counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A20s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.