Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Smoke black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version, so it gives some additional features and a performance increase. The Galaxy A25 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G Power.
Motorola Moto G Power has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes better photographs and videos than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back camera and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G's battery duration is very similar to the Motorola Moto G Power one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.