Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30 is a bit better than Moto G Power, with a global score of 79.6 against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy A30's body is notably thinner and lighter than Moto G Power, although it was released a bit more more than a year before. Moto G Power has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A30 and Motorola Moto G Power have similar screens, and although the Samsung Galaxy A30 has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit higher pixels density, they both have a same size screen. Moto G Power captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 mega-pixels, a same size camera aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Moto G Power also has a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A30's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to Motorola Moto G Power's one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power counts with longer battery life than Galaxy A30, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.