Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. Even when Samsung Galaxy A30s and the Motorola Moto G Power were released only 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A30s is somewhat lighter and notably thinner. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 operating system.
Moto G Power features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A30s. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Moto G Power also has more pixels per display inch and a way better 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution.
Galaxy A30s has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A30s also has more internal storage. Moto G Power features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Motorola Moto G Power takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a camera with a much worse 16 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.