Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a bit better than Moto G Power, getting an 81.3 score against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A31 is a thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Moto G Power, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A31 has 10 version while Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The Moto G Power and the Galaxy A31 feature similar processing units, they have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy A31 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A31 also has a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has as much storage for apps and games as the Motorola Moto G Power, they have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a battery duration that is very similar to the battery life in Motorola Moto G Power.
Galaxy A31 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a way larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.