Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-04-16 | -- |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | -- |
| 7.02 ounces | -- |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 has a global score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Power's general score of 76.1. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy A34 has a more recent 13 version and Moto G Power has Android 11, counting with a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy A34 design is notably lighter and much thinner than Moto G Power.
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a little sharper display than Moto G Power, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite better display pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G Power counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A34, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G Power also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution and a way tinier camera sensor taking much lower quality videos and photographs, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy A34's battery lifetime is very similar to Moto G Power's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.