Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a bit better than Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a noticeably newer and thinner device than Moto G Power, although it's just a little heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11.
The Moto G Power features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A35 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Moto G Power has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in Moto G Power.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.