Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A40 is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G Power, with a global score of 79.6 against 76.1. The Galaxy A40 design is way lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released a little bit over a year before. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Galaxy A40 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Moto G Power and the Galaxy A40 count with really similar memory to install games and applications, both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Power features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A40. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Motorola Moto G Power has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same resolution back facing camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a lot higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.