Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A41 is just a bit better than Moto G Power, having a score of 81.7 against 76.1. Although Samsung Galaxy A41 and Moto G Power were only released 1 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A41 is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the same OS features.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Moto G Power, both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy A41 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit better screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A41 has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Moto G Power, they have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power features a superior battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy A41 features a better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.