Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Smoke black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than Motorola Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Moto G Power, even though it was released a bit more further than a year before. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a little better performance than Moto G Power. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A50 takes clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a 0.36 inches sensor, the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50 also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution. Moto G Power has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy A50 is more expensive than the Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.