Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is better than the Motorola Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Even when Samsung Galaxy A50s and Motorola Moto G Power were released with only 6 months difference, Samsung Galaxy A50s is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A50s features a little sharper screen than Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy A50s also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A50s has a superior camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better storage for apps and games than Moto G Power, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal storage. Moto G Power features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.