Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than Moto G Power, getting an 85.5 score against 76.1. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should give very similar OS features. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 and Moto G Power were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy A51 is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A51 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit larger screen and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit better CPU than Moto G Power. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A51 also has 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A51 shoots better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Moto G Power counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.