Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Smoke black | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a score of 90.8, which is better than Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 operating system, so both should offer the same operating system features. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Moto G Power were released with only a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a bit greater screen density, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G Power, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G Power counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G costs a lot more than Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.