Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Motorola Moto G Power, having a overall score of 90.7 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is newer, thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power. Galaxy A52 features a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a quite bigger screen, a little greater display pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A52 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A52 takes much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures.
The Moto G Power features a bit better battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.