Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Smoke black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it is also thinner and just a little lighter than the Moto G Power. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Moto G Power has Android 11, providing some extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy A52 5G has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way bigger camera sensor and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto G Power has a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.