Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Smoke black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 150.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than the Motorola Moto G Power, having a overall score of 91.1 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is newer, thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G Power. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Power, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a bit greater pixels density.
Galaxy A52s has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Power has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52s features a greater camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.